Faculty Survey - Spring 2023
Survey Text
Survey Results
Other Surveys
Survey Interpretation
Computer Lab Management (CLM) periodically surveys faculty who teach in our computer classrooms. CLM uses this information to improve the quality of service in the computer classrooms. The survey results (especially question #2) show that overall faculty are quite happy with the computer classrooms.
However, there were some concerns raised in the comments:
- Apple has changed the security configuration in macOS and requires each user authorize various applications to use the camera, microphone, etc. We are attempting to find ways to pre-authorize common applications, but have not found any methods which work consistently. Hopefully Apple will provide better tools to support computer classroom environments in the future.
- There were several comments about the layout in different classrooms. Currently we have several layouts and each has trade-offs which favor some pedagogical methods but make other methods less effective. CLM needs to figure out how to better match faculty with their preferred classrooms. Unfortunately, in most cases course reservations are made so far in advance the faculty are not assigned until much later. We need work with the departmental schedulers to investigate processes to better place faculty.
Survey Text
Survey Results
Question 2. Please rate the following aspects of our services:
Needs significant improvement | Needs some improvement | Needs little or no improvement | No opinion | |
Classroom availability (able to reserve times needed) | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5 |
Support from computer lab managers | 0 | 0 | 16 | 2 |
Support from the Computer Room Consultant (CRC) | 0 | 1 | 15 | 2 |
Preparedness of the classroom (room cleared out, whiteboard supplies, etc.) | 0 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
Computer usability and reliability | 1 | 5 | 12 | 0 |
Preventing classroom interruptions | 0 | 1 | 15 | 2 |
Classroom size (too small or too large) | 0 | 2 | 15 | 1 |
Temperature control (room was too hot or too cold) | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
Layout of the classroom | 2 | 1 | 15 | 0 |
Classroom environment (cleanliness, sound, etc.) | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 |
Other - Please specify below | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 |
Classroom environment and Other reasons:
- SCC 2102 is excellent!
- Rooms were too cold sometimes.
- The damaged whiteboard partition needs to be replaced. It has been damaged for several years. (2103 SCC)
- In 247, the teacher's computer needs system settings updated to allow Zoom to use the microphone and camera. I had 2 different CRCs come in and change settings, but they didn't change the system settings, so every class I had to open Zoom, click on use the camera and mic, then get into system settings and make the change, then close Zoom and reopen for those devices to work. This was not an issue last quarter in 247.
- I was not able to control the temperature and the fan. It was a bit cold. You can stop the fan only for few minutes and then the fans start to run again (2212 & 2216 TLC)
- The layout of 90A really prevents interaction among students
- 90B is a great classroom. So glad I was not assigned 90A (very different layout that changes pedagogical approach and makes collaborative learning challenging).
- TLC
- It would be great if we have more labs for larger classes. The room temperature was a little too high.
- I Love teaching in TLC 2211! However, the overhead speakers were sometimes turned off and sometimes the controls for the monitors near the students' tables didn't function properly. Also, the "call bell" icon on the desktop to call the CRC for help in the classroom didn't work.
Shields 90A is much more difficult to teach in. The configuration of the room doesn't allow for group work, it's dark in the room, and there's no desk space in the room for the instructor to confer with students. Furthermore, there are two or three extra instructor chairs in the room, making it hard to move around. - Everything was great! It would be great if the blinds could get fixed though :) (2102 SCC)
Question 3. How would you rate your overall experience teaching in CLM Computer Classrooms this quarter compared with previous quarters?
Better | 0 |
Same | 12 |
Worse | 2 |
N/A | 2 |
"Better" Reasons given:
- None
"Same" Reasons given:
- Same excellent quality!
- Good lab and support
- the CLM computer room and staff was fantastic in all quarters
- I have not had any issues with computer labs. Staff have always answered my question and kept the rooms very clean. :)
- N/A
- TLC 2211 needs to add another screen that is central. I suggest a drop down screen in front of the whiteboard behind instructor's desk. The tables and several screens are nice for collaborative work, but sometimes one really needs a central screen. When we did student presentations, students ended up looking at the screen by the table and not at the presenter, and when I did work on grammar etc. I was stuck on my desktop instead of being able to show things on the big screen like in other classrooms.
- Support excellent as usual.
- It's always a great space to teach in!
"Worse" Reasons given:
- The problem isn't about anything on your end. I just can't get the students to use the classroom computers. Every one of them brings a laptop. One student didn't one day, but insisted on doing the work on his phone rather than logging in on the desktop. He seemed to think he would be unable to navigate a strange computer. I'm just not sure the current layout makes sense anymore, given their attachment to their own machines.
"N/A" Reasons given:
- None
Question 4. What pedagogical issues, if any, have you faced while teaching in a computer classroom?
- none
- none
- Just the system settings not giving Zoom access to the microphone and camera.
- none
- None, except that the layout makes such a difference!
- See above. Students' attention on focusing on small screens when we actually needed to be focusing on a single central screen.
- None.
- N/A
- See my comment above about teaching in 90A. All computer classrooms should be reconfigured to look much more like TLC 2211.
- None
- N/A
Question 5. What technological issues, if any, have you faced while teaching in a computer classroom?
- none
- The computer program that projects students' desktops onto the projector screen didn't work in Olson 241 and the consultant didn't know how to fix the issue. It worked in Olson 21, though.
- computers need better Processors, RAM, & GPUs (2103 SCC)
- Students not having good wi-fi, or in TLC, not having the monitors set up to show the teaching computer's screen.
- none
- I noticed that some computers in 90A needed updates
- The small screens did not all turn on at once, so I often had to go back and forth trying to turn each one separately. This meant that unlike other computer labs, I had to be in the classroom much earlier to make sure all the screens were on. (2211 TLC)
- None
- N/A
- See my comment above about technological issues
Question 6. Do you have any other comments or suggestions regarding the computer classrooms.
- Please keep a blu-ray/DVD player in SCC 2102 and 2103 as well as printers. DES 016 prints 1-3 pages a class per week. Color and B&W
- Please fix damaged whiteboard partition.
- Update the names of the rooms on this survey, I was in 2060 Esau which I assume is 2060 SciLab.
- from my perspective the CLM computer room and staff was fantastic
- Thanks for all the support!
- N/A
- N/A
- Working well!
- Thank you!
Other Surveys
- Student Survey (Winter 2023)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2022)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2022)
- Student Survey (Winter 2022)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2021)
- Student Survey (Winter 2020)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2019)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2019)
- Student Survey (Winter 2019)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2018)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2018)
- Student Survey (Winter 2018)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2017)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2017)
- Student Survey (Winter 2017)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2016)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2016)
- Student Survey (Winter 2016)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2015)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2015)
- Student Survey (Winter 2015)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2014)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2014)
- Student Smartphone Survey (Spring 2014)
- Student Laptop Survey (Spring 2014)
- Student Survey (Winter 2014)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2013)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2013)
- Student Survey (Winter 2013)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2012)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2012)
- Student Survey (Winter 2012)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2011)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2011)
- Student Survey (Winter 2011)
- Student Smartphone Survey (Winter 2011)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2010)
- Student Survey (Winter 2010)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2009)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2009)
- Student Survey (Winter 2009)
- Student Smart Phone Survey (Winter 2009)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2008)
- Student Survey (Winter 2008)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2007)
- Student Survey (Winter 2007)
- Student Laptop Survey (Winter 2007)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2006)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2006)
- Student Survey (Winter 2006)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2005)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2005)
- Student Survey #1 (Winter 2005)
- Student Survey #2 - Laptop Use (Winter 2005)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2004)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2004)
- Student Survey #1 (Winter 2004)
- Student Survey #2 (Winter 2004)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2003)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2003)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2002)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2002)
- Student Survey #1 (Winter 2002)
- Student Survey #2 (Winter 2002)
- Student Survey #3 (Winter 2002)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2001)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2001)
- Student Survey (Winter 2001)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 2000)
- Duplex Printing (Summer 2000)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 2000)
- Student Survey (Spring 2000)
- Student Survey (Winter 2000)
- Faculty Survey (Fall 1999)
- Faculty Survey (Spring 1999)
- Student Survey (Spring 1999)
- Student Survey (Fall 1998)
- Faculty Survey (Winter 1998)
- Student Survey (Winter 1998)
- Student Survey (Winter 1997)
- ASUCD Student Computer Survey (Winter 1997)
Survey Results
Survey Interpretation
Other Surveys